Active Ingredient: Isotretinoin
Or would the decision makers themselves be the only ones exempted?
As you know, my views are far from libertarian but I question the purpose of certification in the regulatory process see first question above.
The credibility and background of a witness is always fair game in the adversarial process, as it should be, but cases are decided by the weight of the evidence, not the stature of who is presenting it.
Some of us like it that way. From Nicholas A. For witnesses?
What would be the role of non-certified persons and stakeholder representatives in the regulatory process? Would they be given a new status that means their testimony gets less consideration? How would that work?
Or would they be prohibited from participating? How do I get an outside line?
Paris says... Eblanned says...
Normand says... Could I have, please? Cote cited the increasing demands on directors of companies in the financial services sector and his limited personal time.
Kaitlyn says... She also claims that Filner asked her to be alone with him to consummate their relationship and asked her to come to work without panties. Parker says... Jamey says...